EEG: Visual Working Memory in Acute TBI
…Data collected 2016-2018 in the Center for Brain Recovery and Repair…
- Participants
- 91
- Channels
- 65 (10-10)
- Size
- 37.5 GB
- Version
- v1.0.0
- Updated
- Jul 10, 2026
100 results for "cognitive recovery" · page 1 of 10 · ranked by relevance
…Data collected 2016-2018 in the Center for Brain Recovery and Repair…
…Retrieval with Feedback and Cognitive Adaptation EEG Dataset provides an open-access…
…Data collected 2016-2018 in the Center for Brain Recovery and Repair…
This dataset contains EEG recordings from 34 participants collected to investigate the adaptive recruitment of cortex-wide recurrent processing during visual object recognition. Participants viewed a stimulus set of 242 images, comprising 'challenge' and 'control' images selected based on discrepancies between human behavioral performance and AlexNet classification, while performing a rapid serial visual presentation task with a paper-clip detection component. The dataset includes derivatives with time-resolved decoding accuracy matrices for object identity, supporting analyses of recurrent cortical dynamics in visual processing.
…Data collected 2016-2018 in the Center for Brain Recovery and Repair…
This dataset comprises MEG, MRI, EMG, and eye-tracking data from 31 healthy right-handed adults performing a sequential finger tapping task (SFTT) to study early motor skill learning, overnight consolidation, and longer-term retention. Participants completed an initial MEG training session followed by up to two retest sessions approximately 24 hours and 30 days later, with resting-state MEG collected before and after each practice block. The dataset supports investigation of neural correlates of motor skill acquisition and memory consolidation.
…of alternating closed and open eyes, followed by 2 minutes of recovery.
…Full task (NB-MA-Act-Mot, combined cognitive-motor condition) All recordings…
This dataset contains EEG and eye-tracking recordings from 30 participants who searched for objects in naturalistic scenes and intentionally memorized others, followed by a surprise recognition memory test. The study examines the 'search superiority effect,' testing whether incidentally encoded memories differ qualitatively from intentional ones through recollection and familiarity processes indexed by FN400 and late parietal ERP components. Behavioral remember-know judgments and ROC analyses were used alongside EEG measures to disentangle these memory processes.