PURSUE N400 Word Processing
[
- Size
- 8.98 GB
- Version
- v1.0.0
- Updated
- Aug 18, 2026
100 results for "Semantic Annotation" · page 4 of 10 · ranked by relevance
[ viewing object images at 3.33 Hz to investigate how contextual associations, perceptual attributes, and conceptual properties of objects are represented in neural activity. One participant was excluded due to a technical error in EEG recording. Time-resolved neural decoding was applied to disentangle these distinct representational dimensions from the EEG signals.
[ from 10 healthy participants during a visual object recognition task. Participants viewed 5,184 photographs from six object categories (human body, human face, animal body, animal face, fruit/vegetable, and inanimate objects), with 72 photographs per category, presented for 500 ms each. The dataset is suitable for investigating neural representations of object categories through single-trial EEG classification and representational similarity analysis.
…reading Wikipedia sentences while annotating specific semantic relations.) Each reading block is…
…Trial-aligned event annotations, including event onsets, trigger values, block labels, speed…
An electroencephalography (EEG) dataset acquired using BioSemi equipment to investigate implicit learning processes. This raw neuroimaging dataset contains EEG recordings organized according to the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) standard, facilitating standardized analysis and sharing of electrophysiological data.
This dataset comprises preprocessed EEG recordings from 6 healthy participants performing imagined speech tasks, specifically discriminating between short and long words ('cooperate' vs 'in'). Data were acquired at 256 Hz using 64 EEG channels and processed with bandpass filtering (8-70 Hz), notch filtering (60 Hz), and artifact removal. The dataset contains 1,200 trials. Classification results (mean accuracy 73.3±8.9%) reported in the original Nguyen et al. 2017 study are provided for reference.
[ recorded at 256 Hz from 64 channels. Data were analyzed using Riemannian manifold methods and relevance vector machines for brain-computer interface applications, achieving mean classification accuracy of 66.2±4.8%.